Wednesday, October 30, 2013

A Couple More Things I Noticed About The American Horror Story: Coven Title Sequence



1.  Circa 27 seconds in is an image of San Simon. Of course I already mentioned in a previous blog of the image of Santa Muerte.

2.  The black witch costumes seem to have been based on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse where U.S. soldiers tortured and sodomized prisoners. To be more specific, the witch costumes seem to be based on the outfits the soldiers made the prisoners wear. You cans see an image of such at the below link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

Vampire Blood Incense




The last time I went to my local occult store I picked up some Vampire Blood incense. Here's what the package reads:

"Vampire blood is harvested through an advanced process in which vampires are slowly bled. The unearthly qualities of the blood are isolated and extracted into a premium incense. Some vampires were harmed during this process but none met true death. This is a rare premium extract of Vampire Blood that is sure to heighten the senses and create inner sensations of Nirvana. Enjoy."

It smells great! It smells like a mixture of florals, dragon's blood, and some sandalwood. It's also hand-rolled, organic and eco-friendly. I will be burning it on my ancestor honor this Halloween/All Saint's Day/All Soul's Day, as a gift for the spirits I work with.



Night Visitors

UFOs Then And Now? - Nightmares (2004)

In Search Of History - Salem Witch Trials (1998)

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

American Occult

Just in time for Halloween, three episodes of the series, "American Occult". The series documents true encounters with evil, devil worship and human sacrifice.



For the second episode, click HERE.

Fro the third episode, click HERE.

Vampire Secrets (2006)

Real Vampires

Real Halloween Decoration!

I got an interesting shock this morning. There was a large black widow spider, real not fake, on my frond door. It was like a real life Halloween decoration. I thought about saving it for some goofer dust or what not but I have this pact with poisonous critters. I don't harm them and they don't harm me. So I scooped it up in a bowl and set it down on some bushes around the house. The poor thing was probably just trying to find a spot to lay her eggs.

Below is a video of a man here in Oklahoma handling a black widow spider.


Saturday, October 26, 2013

RIP Maria Wallace (Edna Krabapple)



Maria Wallace, the actress who played Edna Krabapple, Bart's teacher in The Simpson's has passed away at the young age of 70 years from breast cancer. She will be greatly missed. Just the other day I was telling my friend that the Simpson's has been on for so long that when the actors begin to die that we will grieve for them as if they were our own kin. Wallace, thank you for your many years of presenting such a funny and witty character. You will be greatly missed.

My favorite scene with Edna Krabapple is where she was dressed in the balloons and singing, "Fever" in front of the school for that talent show thing. That was hilarious for her singing, "You give me fever"...and then her popping a balloon with her cigarette. Hilarious! So sad to hear of her passing.

The Grand Jury's Indictment Of The Ramsey's And What It Means



So in case your are curious this is actually important information. It's important because it reveals what the Grand Jury believed happened and what two DA's were doing behind the scenes to help their friends, the Ramsey's.

The Grand Jury's indictment basically said that they believed that the Ramsey's knew that JonBenet as being abused and did nothing to stop it. As a result of the abuse JonBenet died and then the parents acted to cover up for the killer. If this is not important then I don't know what is.

DA Alex Hunter and DA Mary Lacey have been very controversial figures in this case. Hunter not only handed over evidence to the Ramsey's but also leaked damaging, sensitive information to the press that some believe was done in an attempt to sabotage the Boulder polices' investigation. Hunter was also accused of tipping off the Ramsey's of when the police would be paying visits. He was also the one who "cleared" Burke, the older son, of any wrong-doing even though as a minor he could not have been charged with a crime. 

DA Mary Lacey has done so many shady things I can't even begin to list them here. For one, she openly stated in court that the Grand Jury never gave an indictment, which we now know to be false. She arrested a man (John Karr) first and only then investigated him, ending up with egg on her face when it was revealed that one off Lacey's acquaintances was leaking info to Karr in emails so that he would know the correct things to say. Lacey also refused to pursue anything other than the intruder theory and made public statements that she knew that Patys Ramsey was innocent because a woman could never do such a horrible crime as molesting and killing her daughter! This is how stupid this woman is. Her greatest faux pas yet was when she "cleared" the Ramsey's of wrong doing based on alleged and extremely weak DNA evidence that she claimed was new but in reality was always there from the beginning. The DNA is so weak that it could have come from a single cell. It's so weak it could have come from the sneeze of the person in China who manufactured the panties that it was found on. Yet Lacey believed this cleared the Ramsey's so she held a press conference and publicly cleared them. Then she quickly retired from office and refused to address any questions on her controversial actions. My readers, in my opinion, this is the reason why the case was never solved. In my opinion the wealth off the Ramsey's and the actions of DA Alex Hunter and DA Mary Lacey, as well as some early mistakes by the police, all merged to make sure that the truth would never come out.

On top of that Nancy Grace opened up her fat, harpy jaws and screeched about how offensive it was that people were blaming Blurke, who was 9 years old at the time, for JonBenet's murder. Grace can't imagine how a 9 year old boy could have carried this out. All I can say is that the Grand Jury believed that the Ramsey's covered up for the killer. That covering up could have included staging most if not all of the elements of what we know of the crime.

Readers, if you want to know the truth of what happened to JonBenet read the book, "Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet" by DA investigator, James Kolar. He's see all of the evidence and reveals information that has been previously kept secret. Read the book and you will know what happened and who killed JonBenet.

To listen to an episode of Tricia's True Crime Radio, featuring the author, click HERE.  Search her site for many more interviews with the author and about JonBenet's murder.

Sightings - Ghosts (1992)

So Bummed!

Today there are two Halloween events I wanted to attend. The first one is the annual Halloween bash at the local occult shop I visit. Thy always have good food and prizes and sometimes they even hold free classes. It's a great way to meet new people Also, they have their annual sale where you buy one thing at regular prize and you get the second item of equal or lesser value at half price. It's a great opportunity to take advantage of. Unfortunately, I'm flat broke and it's pouring raining and I don't think I'll be able to make it.

The second event is OKC's annual Halloween parade. It's so freaking awesome. It's like the Halloween-version of Mardi Gras here. It's always a blast. It used to be hosted by the Flaming Lips but now it's done by the Oklahoma's Gazette, pretty much the only "newspaper" I read. It's awesome.





The zombie walk is pretty cool. One year they had this kid running and screaming in front of them and then he "tripped" and they all descended upon him like a pack of wolves. It was pretty cool.

I love Halloween. It's like my Christmas. So I always get bummed when I can't participate/enjoy some of the events. :(

Friday, October 25, 2013

CBS Remaking 'Charmed'

CBS has ordered a script for a potential remake of the t.v. show 'Charmed'. The original CW show lasted 8 seasons and was a hit with it's target audience.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/25/charmed-reboot-cbs_n_4164486.html



I loved Charmed but what I couldn't stand about it was the horrible writing. They were always making mistakes with continuity and with stuff they established in prior episodes. It's like none of the writers ever read each other's scripts. LOL

As long as they do it justice, I'm game. We need more witch shows on t.v. anyway.

Halloween Food Ideas

This is yoyomax12's YouTube playlist for some Halloween treats. I like yoyomax12. She makes some really cool stuff. My favorite of her Halloween treats is the severed finger cookies!

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Temple Whores

If you read my previous blog entry on temple prostitution then here's a few more videos featuring temple whores to help give you a better idea of what they do and the excuses they come up with to rationalize prostitution. For example, this temple whore below uses the term "Goddessing" in place of prostitution! LOL (Just for the record, I'm using the term 'whore' correctly as it means prostitute!)



This woman is either a temple whore or is just a supporter of temple whores/temple prostitution.


Interview with a temple whore


Longer interview with temple whore


Here's one of the male temple whores


The male temple whore is the type of "homosexuality" the bible is condemning. The bible is not against gay people. The bible is against immoral sexual acts and especially the joining of immoral sexual acts with idolatry/pagan worship. That's the condemnation of so-called "homosexuality" in the bible.

God loves gay people. Jesus loves gay people. Gay people can be Christians and they can be saved and do not have to change their sexuality in order to be saved. Praise Jesus!

Temple Prostitutuion - Why The Biblical Passages Used To Condemn Gay People Actually Speak Nothing About Gay People

Leviticus 18:22
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Romans 1:26-27
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

For far too long fundamentalist Christian, more specifically Preachers, Pastors, Priests, Nuns, and Sunday School Teachers, have knowingly and with pride lied and deliberately misinterpreted these passages to mean something they do not. That lie is that these passages mean that being gay is a sin and gay people are to be put to death.

The reality is that the passage in Romans, wich is written by Paul, is merely reflecting back upon the passages in Leviticus. The passages in Leviticus are all about a practice which I will now explain. In order to explain it I will have to show it to you. So unlike the lying, deceiving Pastors/Preachers/Priests, etc., I will show you the truth.

I'm not going to post it here but I urge you to read Leviticus 18 as it pertains to the holiness code with regard to sexuality. The holiness code or purity code are things that the gentiles did which the Hebrews are warned not to do. The chapter deals with many different sexual scenarios and taboos. The thing is that it include verse 22 above that seemingly says that a man can not have sex with another man. For one, I want you to notice how nowhere is there a mention of women having sex with women. So apparently God is male after all as two women having sex is perfectly okay with him, right? Going further, one of the rules is that a man can not have contact with a woman on her period. He especially can't have sexual contact with her. How many men violate this rule today but will freely stand up and try to enforce verse 22 against gay people? That my readers is the definition of hypocrisy and hypocrites do not inherit the kingdom.

Leviticus 18:19
Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness.

So what's the story, Doc? The story is this. The key thing to remember is that these are things that the gentiles did that the Hebrews were supposed to refrain from doing. Were the gentiles a bunch of flaming faggots? Surely this refers to two men being in a loving, committed relationship, right? The answer to both is an astounding 'negative'!

The "homosexuality" performed by the gentiles that the Hebrews were not to take part in is:

1. Temple Prostitution
2. Pederasty
3. Male Prostitution (often boys)
4. Men raping other men

There was no concept of two men living together in a committed, loving relationship. Since this concept did not exist in the minds of straight people at this time then it reasons that there can not be any laws against it. Verse 22 is not about any two men or males having sex. It's about one of the categories above.

Leviticus chapter 20, which you should also read, is a repeat of chapter 18 for one small difference. That difference is the inclusion of the prohibition against witchcraft. Again, these codes of conduct are meant to distinguish the Hebrews from the gentiles, to set them apart. The Hebrews are not supposed to associated with witchcraft because the gentiles are obsessed with it.

So let's break down the four classes in reverse order.

Number 4 refers to men who rape other men. This can take place during times of warfare when a warrior may anally rape a captured enemy in public. To publicly rape a man was a fate considered worse than death. This is because there was a strong taboo in the ancient world against men who acted feminine. This included playing a passive role in sex. So to anally rape a man in public was to turn that man into a woman. If the raped man wasn't killed he often would take his own life afterwards. Rape is also what was going to take place in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. What happened there was not homosexuality, but rather rape. Male rape continues to this day in prison and in times of war. Do you remember the abuse at Abu Ghraib, where US citizens were raping, sodomizing, and physically torturing prisoners? Well, this is what is being referenced. This is a type of practice the bible forbids. God detests this. It is not a reference to gay people. The men who rape other men do not consider themselves gay. It's a power thing. In the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal, even women took part in the rape/sodomy and torture of prisoners.

Number 3 refers to male prostitution, something we should all comprehend. There are female prostitutes and there are male prostitutes. The bible forbids the use of both male and female prostitutes. In ancient days, boy prostitutes were the preferred form of male prostitutes. Like today, the boys were often homeless and had no other means of supporting themselves. The bible forbids the use of male prostitutes. This has nothing to do with two gay men in a loving, committed relationship.

Number 2 refers to the practice of pederasty. Pederasty is a practice that is still alive and well today.  Jerry Sandusky is not a pedophile, he is a pederast. Pederasty involves an adult man sexually pursuing a teenage boy. It was legal and an accepted practice in the ancient world. There were some rules however. In Greece and Rome, it was not acceptable for an adult male to sexually penetrate another adult free man or the child of a free man. So other, non-penetrative forms of sexual expression took place. However, it was perfectly acceptable for an adult man to sexually penetrate a slave or a non-citizen. Many Greek and Romen men had special servants that were usually between the ages of say 11-16 with whom they orally and anally penetrated. There is much art from this time period showing adult men sexually penetrating teenage boys. When a boy was able to grow a beard the sexual relationship was then terminated unless the boy was a slave and the sexual relationship could continue the rest of his life. The bible forbids this practice. The assumption is the teenage boy is being seduced and victimized (the notion that a teenage boy could be the aggressor and actively seek out sex with older men seems not to have ever occurred to people even though we know it most likely took place just as it takes place today).  This is not about two adult men in a loving, committed relationship. This is not about the concept of being gay as we understand it today.

Number 1 refers to "temple prostitution". Temple prostitution, a.k.a sacred prostitution, is when married male Hebrews would go to pagan temples and take part in pagan worship rituals in which they had sex with male and female prostitutes. Many pagans worshipped a fertility goddess,  or "mother goddess". The worship of this goddess included sacred acts of sex believers had with pagan priests. In many pagan cults, male priests dressed as women and would expose their rears to what we would consider "straight men". These "straight men" would then proceed to have anal sex with the male priests, often in front of other worshippers. The semen was then collected and sprinkled around the temple or wiped on the idols. This offering of semen was believed to be an offering to the fertility goddess herself. In return for the gift of semen the goddess was believed to bless the land with fertility and prosperity. This is the male-male form of sacred sex. Male-female sacred sex took place as well. It was said that at the temple of Aphrodite that women were REQUIRED to have sex with at least one stranger. They must go to the temple steps and wait for the first man to "purchase them". Any man who wanted them had to offer them any sum of money, no matter how large or small. The woman could not refuse him. She would hike up her robes and have sex with him then and there. Once the man ejaculated her service to Aphrodite was concluded and she was allowed to go on with her life. The story goes that beautiful women were quickly relieved of this burden because they found men who wanted to have sex with them really fast. Ugly women had to sit on the steps for years until some man took pity on them. That's the story anway. The whole reason for temple prostitution was to get the semen. Back at this time people didn't understand the role of the woman in procreation. It was believed that a woman was like a field. A man "ploughed" her and planted his seed in her and the seed grew into a baby. The ancients didn't know about egg cells or ovulation or anything like that. So semen took on an almost magical quality. It was believed to be imbued with the life-force. It was viewed on the same level that blood was. So just as the pagan gods "ate" the life-force of the blood sacrifice the fertility goddess would do the same with the semen. Or perhaps the conjoined semen somehow "impregnated" the goddess and she gave birth to fertility and prosperity. Additionally, the pagan prostitute priests often charged money and this became a good way for the temple to become wealthy.  The bible forbids this practice. This is not two men in a loving, committed relationship.

There is not one single passage in the bible that condemns gay people as we understand them. Not a single passage! Being gay is not a sin. Promiscuity is a sin. Hiring a prostitute is a sin. Rape is a sin. Have sex with underage boys and girls is a sin. Being in a loving, committed relationship with a person of the same-sex is not a sin. Enough with the hate.

Now to speak out on some things about modern pagans. Readers, temple prostitution is making a return. Back in the 90s I met a Wiccan who invited me to what turned out to be an orgy. The thing to note that it was combined with their religion. A couple of years ago a Phoenix-based Goddess temple was busted for it being a prostitution ring. The temple had both female and male prostitutes who had sex with worshippers in exchange for money or "donations". The group tried to claim that this was religious expression and thus protected under their right to freedom of religion. This was flat out temple prostitution. Then a famous Pagan blog, which I will not name here, did an blog on the group being arrested. The Pagan blog owner raged against the police for daring to arrest the Pagan group and basically claimed it was a violation of their religious rights. There were hundreds of comments to the blog entry. The overwhelming majority of them were fellow Wiccans and Pagans who supported the group and believed that it was a travesty of justice that they were arrested. Then someone brought up temple prostitution and said that all Pagans should come together to restore this worship of the goddess. That comment received dozens of comments in support. When I read this thread I immediately recognized the demonic energy at work. The majority of these Wiccans and Pagans were demon possessed. This is what God is condemning. Not only that but when people engage in this sort of behavior God turns them loose. He withdraws the conscious, that voice telling them this behavior is wrong and that they should respect themselves, and turns them over to their vile passions. Because God doesn't have to punish them. They will punish themselves. They will destroy their own bodies and pave the way for their own destruction.




It's temple prostitution, pederasty, male prostitution, and men raping men, that the bible is condemning. The bible is not condemning two men or two women in a committed, loving relationship simply because this concept did not exist in ancient times. Ancient people had no concept of our modern understanding of gay people. The only thing they knew of homosexuality were these despicable actions. The very fact that Leviticus doesn't condemn lesbians sex should be proof enough that it's not referring to gay people but to these vile actions.

So to recap, the prohibitions in the passages in Leviticus are part of  the holiness code or purity code meant to separate Hebrews from the gentile nations. By adding them the authors of the bible are saying, "Don't do what the pagans do!". The pagans of this time did not have a concept of two men and two women being in a committed loving relationship. Instead, they engaged in temple prostitution, in pederasty, in male prostitution, and in men raping men. This is what the bible is forbidding, not gay people in committed, loving relationships. The passages in the book of Romans is simply referring back to the passages in Leviticus.  That modern concept of gay people didn't exist in ancient times and thus there is nothing in the bible that condemns it.


NOTE: Temple prostitution continues in many places. For example, it still takes place in India today and unfortunately it often involves young girls as young as 11 years old or whenever they have their first period.

http://www.todayschristianwoman.com/articles/2013/april/from-temple-prostitution-to-new-life-in-christ.html


Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Eunuchs In The Bible

Matthew 19:12 KJV
 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

A eunuch is technically a male that has been castrated or at least that's how we in modern times perceive the meaning of eunuch to be. In the ancient world the term eunuch had a wider definition.

In biblical times, the term eunuch refers to men who have been castrated, men who have had their testicles and penis removed, men who were born deformed or incapable of having sex with women and fathering children, men who are celibate, and what we now would call gay men. Jesus must have included homosexuals into the category of eunuch and had this in mind when he spoke these words.


Acts 8:26-39 KJV
26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.
27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,
28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.
29 Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot.
30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?
31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth:
33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.
34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?
35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.
36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.

You may not believe me but the Ethiopian eunuch was likely also homosexual. Not only that but it's also more likely that Philip knew that this man was a homosexual. Now, it's hard to tell if this man was a homosexual. It's also possible this man had his penis removed. However, I tend to favor this man as being a homosexual. The reason being is that he was part of the court of the Queen. Back in those days there was fear that the royal court would try to sway the monarchy and gain power, possibly even overthrow it. So the normal routine was to have all of the males that served the king or queen intimately to not only be eunuchs but to go one step further and either have their penis removed as well as their testicles or to have them be homosexuals. The reason for this thinking was that they knew that castrated men can still have erections and still engage in sex. Not only can castrated men still engage in sex but it became vogue for women to prefer castrated men for sexual pleasure as castrated men do not ejaculate and thus can last a lengthy amount of time, long enough for the woman to orgasm and often multiple times. So to be absolutely sure that these eunuchs can not have any influence of the monarchy many of the court eunuchs either had their penis removed  or they were homosexual. So although I can't say for certain that this eunuch in the passages above was homosexual, what I can say is that there is a very good possibility that this man was homosexual. The implications are that Philip baptized a homosexual man who was brought into the Church without the need to repent or turn away from his sexuality. Of course the nasty fundamentalists would argue that this guy was not a homosexual at all.

Daniel, the same Daniel in the lion's den, was also most likely a eunuch (castrated). Daniel was also highly likely to have been homosexual (Dan.1:9). Because he served the king this would have been a requirement. Josephus, the famous historian of antiquity, said that Daniel and his friends were eunuchs.

Paul is also said to have been either a virgin or a eunuch. He could have chosen to be celibate for religious reasons. However, Tertullian flat out says that Paul was castrated. If Paul was in fact castrated it would help to explain his mind frame in which he wrote many of the books of the New Testament.

Perhaps the most famous eunuch of all is Jesus Christ. Jesus was a eunuch, the type that has forsaken sex and has chosen celibacy for religious purposes. However, it's also quite possible that Jesus was a homosexual. I know this is perhaps the worst blasphemy according to some but we at least have to entertain the idea.

John 13:23
Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.

John 19:26
When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!

John 21:7
Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.

John 21:20
Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?

So his is this mysterious "beloved disciple"? Traditionally, it's believed this is a reference to John the Apostle. The text makes it clear that Jesus had a special relationship with John, over and above the other disciples. What type of relationship though? This "beloved disciple" is very interesting but there's little evidence to suggest that Jesus was a homosexual. It's just that we need to be open to the possibility that he was.

I just think it's so funny that with Dan Brown's books came all these theories that Mary Magdalene was Jesus' wife. Nobody seemed to realize that there was perhaps a hint in the New Testament that Jesus may have been gay.






Tuesday, October 22, 2013

More On David & Jonathan's Gay Love In The Bible

I'm currently debating this with a fundamentalist Christian. The thing I picked up a long time ago is that Christians really don't know how much information is contained in the bible. When Christians read the bible the information goes right over their heads.

Let me begin by giving some back story to David and Jonathan and begin by clearing up some things. When most people think of David they think of King David and they view him as this virile, manly-man. However, people seem to forget that when a man is a boy or even a teenager that he may have been quite different. In this case, Jonathan was the oldest son of King Saul and was likely older than David. David was a young teenager and would probably be best described using the gay slang of "twink". He was young and skinny and was probably a pretty boy. David was a harpist in King Saul's court and Jonathan probably saw him often and crushed on him. However, the bible implies that this was 'love at first sight' for Jonathan. But it seems strange that Jonathan wouldn't have noticed David before. Also, it should be stressed that Jonathan is the assertive one in the relationship, with David being passive. Back in this time period there was much shame placed upon men who acted the passive role in homosexual relationships. Men who acted the assertive role were not subject to this sort of shaming. Because David was more of the passive figure this may be why there is no blatant terminology suggesting their homosexual relationship. Instead, it's subtle but it's still definitely there.

So let's start where they first meet, and the "love at first sight" stuff.

1 Samuel 18:1 KJV
And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.

So Jonathan fell immediately in love with David the first time he supposedly saw him. Again, this is strange because he should have seen David often because David was a harpist in King Saul's court. So take of it what you will. In the bible, Jonathan fell in love with David at first site. His soul was merged with David's soul and he loved him deeply. No, nothing gay here at all! LOL

1 Samuel 18:3 KJV
Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul

So Jonathan and David make a covenant with each other because they loved each other so very much. What type of covenant, to be loyal to one another and love each other forever?

1 Samuel 18:4 KJV
And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.

So Jonathan strips naked in front of David. People back then didn't wear underwear. Jonathan was older than David. So Jonathan gets butt naked in front of David and hands him his robe, his sword, his bow and his girdle. This is a well known practice among men who are super close back then. It's a homoromantic and homosocial thing when two guys who loved each other dearly do this as a ritual to cement their relationship.

1 Samuel 18: 17-18 KJV
17. And Saul said to David, Behold my elder daughter Merab, her will I give thee to wife: only be thou valiant for me, and fight the Lord's battles. For Saul said, Let not mine hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him.

18. And David said unto Saul, Who am I? and what is my life, or my father's family in Israel, that I should be son in law to the king?

King Saul wants to give his eldest daughter Merab in marriage to David. Remember, people didn't marry for love back then. Marriage was a social and economic contract. However, David doesn't want to marry her. This is important because David is not stupid. David knows that marriage is a social contract. He knows it doesn't matter if he doesn't love Merab. Being the son in law of King Saul would be a very good thing for it would ensure his wealth and prosperity. However, David doesn't want to marry Merab. Strange. So King Saul gives her to another man. That's the point here. David didn't wan to marry her.

1 Samuel 18:20-21 KJV
20. And Michal Saul's daughter loved David: and they told Saul, and the thing pleased him.

21. And Saul said, I will give him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him. Wherefore Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son in law in the one of the twain.

So David didn't want Merab. However, Michel, another of King Saul's daughters had fallen for David and wanted him as her husband. So she goes tell her daddy that she wants David and King Saul agrees. David goes on to marry Michal. However, at no time in the bible does it ever state that David loved Michal. David ends up with many wives and nowhere is it ever stated in the bible that he loves them. He lusts after them, or some of them at least, but David's great love of his life was with Jonathan. Jonathan is the only person whom David is revealed to truly love. 

Now, let's focus on the last sentence in verse 21 above:

"Wherefore Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son in law in the one of the twain."

Basically Saul is saying that now David is his son-in-law for the second time. How can this be? He married Michal but that's the only daughter he's married. How can this be his second time being Saul's son-in-law? This verse must signify that King Saul recognized that Jonathan and David had some form of union!

1 Samuel 20:4 KJV
Then said Jonathan unto David, Whatsoever thy soul desireth, I will even do it for thee.

So Jonathan says he will do anything for David. This just goes to show how strong his love for David was. It reminds me of that gay themed joke you hear from time to time, "I'll do anything...ANYTHING!" LOL

1 Samuel 20:30 KJV
Then Saul's anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness?

Okay, this is going to take some explaining. I'm pretty sure the meaning of this verse goes right over people's heads. Believe it or not, this verse is King Saul admitting the homosexual relationship between Jonathan and David. People, this may be shocking to you but this was nothing back in this day. It was very common for young men to form temporary homosexual relationships, usually before they got married. King Saul is basically saying, "Look, I'm not stupid. I know you and David are more than just friends and you are bringing shame unto yourself." If that's not enough King Saul is also placing blame on Jonathan's mother. This is interesting because many fathers in modern times also blame the mothers when a son is homosexual, as if the mother did something wrong that caused it. Remember, before this time Saul has made no statement that he did not approve of their relationship. Before this time King Saul knew they were lovers and he approved and he even recognized that Jonathan and David had some form of union. Only now when Saul is upset and views David as a threat to the throne that he doesn't want his son in a homosexual relationship with David.

1 Samuel 20:41 KJV
And as soon as the lad was gone, David arose out of a place toward the south, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times: and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, until David exceeded.

Okay, the problem here is not so much they kissed. People kissed a lot back then, even males with other males. What sets this apart is the last word, exceeded. So what does it mean? Well, honestly I can't tell you. It has two meanings. What you think it means is up to you. One view is that they cried and kissed each other but that David cried and kissed Jonathan more, that David was the more emotional of the two. Another and more controversial meaning is that that they cried and made out with each other until David got an erection.

Jonathan is killed in battle. David says this about him:

2 Samuel 1:26 KJV
 I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.

So David said his love for Jonathan was more than his love for women. People need to realize the importance of this. David would be what we would classify as bisexual. Jonathan would also be classified as bisexual as he too had a wife and a child. However, the great love of David's life was Jonathan. David ended up with multiple wives and many children. However, he truly only loved Jonathan. His dealing with women were strictly sexual and or part of a social contract. There is nothing in the bible about David ever loving a woman in the same manner as he loved Jonathan. He lusted after Bathsheba but he never, ever loved her with the same passion as he loved Jonathan.

I wonder if David thought of Jonathan often or if time eroded his memories. I would like to think that as David knew his time was growing short that he began to think of Jonathan more and more, perhaps hoping they would be reunited.







Gays And The Bible

I've had it with fake ass Christians preaching hatred. So I'm going to post on this.

David (the same David who slew Goliath and grew up to be King) had a homosexual relationship with Jonathon, the son of King Saul.

1 Samuel 18:1-4 KJV
1. And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.

2. And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house.

3. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.

4, And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle.

1 Samuel 20:41 KJV
And as soon as the lad was gone, David arose out of a place toward the south, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times: and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, until David exceeded.

2 Samuel 1:26 KJV
I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.

Modern hate-filled Christians want to lie and say this was just "brotherly-love". Open your damn eyes! If these boys were transported to our times you wouldn't hesitate in calling them faggots! They were in a homosexual relationship. Their souls were "knit together", merged. They weren't twins. They were lovers!  They kissed, they wept, they did everything together. How much gayer can you get? Read 1 and 2  Samuel. There's a lot of gay stuff about them. They were gay and they were in love, no doubt about it. Yes, David went on to be with women and ultimately founded the line that Jesus would arise from, but David's first love was Jonathan. I'm sure David never forgot that.




Daniel, the same Daniel in the lions' den, was likely a homosexual.  According to the famous historian, Josephus, Daniel was a eunuch, a man who had been castrated.

Daniel 1:9 KJV
Now God had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs.

The words used here actually refer to both mercy/favor and physical love/intimacy. Think of it like PDA. They kissed and "made out". They may have even had some form of sexual relationship. The "prince of the eunuchs" is named Ashpenaz. Not only was Daniel likely a homosexual, but the bible clearly reads that God inspired this homoerotic attraction between them for Daniel's protection. It was done to get Ashpenaz on Daniel's side so he will protect him and watch out for him. God puts same-sex love in the hearts of gay people! There is nothing in the bible about the Devil doing it! The key is love.  L_O_V_E!

For you Lesbians out there, Ruth may have been a "sister". In the book of Ruth there is the telling of Ruth's very intimate friendship with Naomi. Just look at how intimate this is:

Ruth 1:16-17 KJV
16.  And Ruth said, Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God:

17. Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the Lord do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me


Now for a few more:

1. The OT prohibition against "homosexuality" is in fact tied up with temple prostitution.  In reality, what is condemned in the OT is the practice of MARRIED HETEROSEXUAL MALE JEWS going to pagan temples and taking place in pagan worship practices and rites that included having anal sex with female and male pagan priests. Many pagans believed that anal sex (and vaginal sex) with sacred temple prostitutes would increase the fertility and prosperity of the land. This is what is forbidden. The OT mentions nothing about two men or two women in a committed, loving relationship.

2. Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because of their wickedness, not because of homosexuality. The men who gathered to rape the angels didn't give a damn that they were male. The men were not homosexuals. They were married and had wives and families. Instead, they were just horribly wicked. The term rape in this instance not only means to sexually violate but they were pretty much going to kill them as well. This simply can not be construed as a condemnation of homosexuality. Rather, it's a condemnation against rape and murder. In Judges 19:25-28, a group of men want to rape another man. The man's concubine volunteers herself in his place. The group agrees to the trade and rapes her and leaves her for dead. So are we supposed to think that heterosexual sex is wrong based on these verses? Of course not! The emphasis is on rape, not consensual sex in a loving relationship.

3. Don't put Paul above the teachings of Christ. So many fake ass Christians do this! They worship Paul, not Christ! They don't even understand what Paul is saying. Paul never once talks about two men and two women in a loving, committed relationship. The only homosexuality Paul knows of is temple prostitution and the Roman practice of pederasty (adult men sexually pursuing teenage boys). This is what Paul is preaching against. Also, the word "effeminate" has been attributed to Paul, as in he condemned it. In reality that word has not been properly translated.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
9. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10. Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

The word for "effeminate" used here is 'Malakoi'. Malakoi means "soft, fine, expensive" and more specifically refers to people, male and female, who pamper themselves, dress themselves up, wear make-up, wear perfume, wear the finest of clothing and jewelry, in order to attract lovers. Paul is not referring to effeminate men. He is referring to these types of peoples. Paul says they will not inherit the kingdom of God, meaning they are going to burn in hell. Well, guess what? Nearly 100% of American women are Malakoi. If you are to take Paul at face value then there is hardly an American woman who will enter heaven. The majority of them will burn in hell for all eternity for being malakoi. This also goes for "metrosexual" men! LOL

Now, the part where Paul says, "nor abusers of themselves with mankind" is actually the Greek word,  "arsenokoitai". 'Arsenokoitai' was seemingly made up by Paul. It's the only time it appears in the bible. It literally means "man-bed". For me at least, I believe Paul was referring once again to the practice of pederasty, the practice of adult men sexually pursuing young teenage boys. Pederasty was acceptable in most of the ancient world and still goes on today. The belief is that the teenage boy is being victimized. This may be true in many cases but in some cases the teenage boy is the aggressor. That's why the punishment for pederasty is generally lower than in actual pedophilia. So I believe Paul was speaking out on the practice of pederasty, with the associated belief that young, teenage boys are being seduced and victimized by older men. That's my view. Again, there is no indication Paul ever imagined there could ever be two men or two women together in a committed, loving relationship. All of his references are to temple prostitutes and Roman pederasty. Let's not forget that even if Paul was speaking out against actual homosexuals and gay people that he is not Christ and he did not die for our sins. He's just a travelling preacher, that's it. I'm not trying to take away from his teachings, but he's not Christ. Let's put Christ first. So what did Jesus have to say about homosexuality?  -Nothing!

There is an interesting event that occurred in the NT that is documented in both Matthew and Luke. It involves Jesus interacting with a Roman Centurion who approaches him to heal his homosexual lover. This is Roman Pederasty. The male lover is also the man's slave. In Roman times a man can not sexually penetrate another free, Roman man. The sexual penetration of a male was only allowed for slaves. Usually the slave in question was also a young teenager, in keep with the Roman practice of Pederasty. So the Centurion was probably a man in his 20s or 30s and his servant (lover) was probably between 12-16 years of age.

Matthew 8:5-13 KJV
And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him,
And saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented.
And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him.
The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed.
For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.
10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.
11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.
12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
13 And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour.

Luke 7:1-10
Now when he had ended all his sayings in the audience of the people, he entered into Capernaum.
And a certain centurion's servant, who was dear unto him, was sick, and ready to die.
And when he heard of Jesus, he sent unto him the elders of the Jews, beseeching him that he would come and heal his servant.
And when they came to Jesus, they besought him instantly, saying, That he was worthy for whom he should do this:
For he loveth our nation, and he hath built us a synagogue.
Then Jesus went with them. And when he was now not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to him, saying unto him, Lord, trouble not thyself: for I am not worthy that thou shouldest enter under my roof:
Wherefore neither thought I myself worthy to come unto thee: but say in a word, and my servant shall be healed.
For I also am a man set under authority, having under me soldiers, and I say unto one, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.
When Jesus heard these things, he marvelled at him, and turned him about, and said unto the people that followed him, I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.
10 And they that were sent, returning to the house, found the servant whole that had been sick.



Notice how Jesus didn't rebuke the man and call him a fag, a queer, and that this was God's judgement against him. Nope, Jesus doesn't condemn him or even admonish him one bit. Instead, Jesus raises him up and makes him a role model all Christians should strive to be more like, this gay man. Why? Because his faith was so strong that he knew that Jesus didn't have to visit his house to heal his lover. He knew that Jesus was so powerful he could heal from a distance. We need to have the faith of this gay, Roman Centurion.

So, I'm sorry you hate-filled "Christians". I'm sorry you were lied too from a very early age. I'm sorry that the Spirit of Truth has not opened your eyes prior. There are gay people in this world. They are created by God and God loves them. Being gay is not a sin. Promiscuity is a sin, but being homosexual is not a sin and homosexuals can be Christians and can be saved. Praise Jesus!

Monday, October 21, 2013

CrazySexyCool - The TLC Story



Man, this is on tonight, a movie about the band TLC. I so want to watch it but right now VH1 has no sound at all. All the other channels are perfectly fine. Pisses me off.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Just Got Back From Watching 'Carrie' - My Review



I ended up seeing the movie. So here's my review. I will begin with the routine spoiler warning.

SPOILER WARNING!
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
First of all, let me state that Carrie and Christine are my two favorite books by Stephen King. Carrie has a special place in my heart because I know she is us, we are her. I know good and well that if I had that power at that age I would set this whole fucking planet on fire, burn it all down! I AM BECOME SHIVA and would rain death and destruction. Death is my gift! LOL Carrie is a part of all of us. Hell, she is Kali.

The movie starts out horribly. It begins with a very bad scene of Carrie's birth. It was unnecessary. It was just one of many poor choices from the director.

Chloe Moretz  is too pretty to play Carrie. She also lacks the emotional depth needed for the role. This is probably due to her age. As a result, Carrie is flat and one-dimensional throughout the entire movie. She fails to convincingly portray an abused/maltreated/bullied girl. It just comes across as pretending.

Julianne Moore is fantastic as Margaret White. Unfortunately her performance doesn't carry the film. Moore does a good job of bringing something new to the role and it shows. It's not easy trying to top Piper Laurie's perfect portrayal of White. Though Moore doesn't eclipse Laurie she still manages a wonderful performance.

The CGI is abused in this film. There is no build-up at all. Carrie is just super-powerful from the start. It crosses the line into the comical when she is able to fly and can split pavement with a stomp. Also, she becomes more like a witch as Chloe or the director decided to go away from Sissy Spacek's "mental power" using only her eyes to now the waving of hands. It makes Carrie look like a witch.

The prom scene had it's good moments but as a whole was horrible. The director decided to change the motivation from Carrie snapping from the pig blood to Tommy's death. That was another poor choice by the director. Sorry, but if someone dumps pig's blood on you when you are at your most vulnerable you are not going to register what is happening around you. Instead, you are going to freak out. It was a very bad decision. If that wasn't bad enough the director also changed it to only a few innocent people were killed. Most of the victims of Carrie were those who mistreated her. Again, horrible choice. The whole point of Carrie is that she is a monster. She began as a mistreated girl but she evolved into a monster. This totally destroys that.

The ending of the movie is horrible. The final shot is Carrie's gravestone cracking with an accompanying scream, all set to rock music. So how dead Carrie can pull this off is never explained.

I can't decide on giving the movie a C- or D. I want to give it a C- because at least it's not as bad as making one want to walk out of the movie. However, what ruined it for me is Chloe Moretz not having the emotional depth needed for the role. This movie in no way, shape, or form even comes close to being better than the 1976 movie. Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie continue to reign supreme!

Note: This movie is a remake of the original 1976 movie and is not a new adaption of the book as we all were led to believe. Keep that in mind.

Friday, October 18, 2013

Don't Waste Your Time On 'Carrie'

Don't waste any money on the new remake of Carrie. Word is it sucks big-time. For one, I guess we were lied too. I had my reservations when I first heard about it because Chloe Moretz is just too pretty to play Carrie. Then I heard they were going to be doing it closer to the book. Turns out that was a lie. It's not closer to the book. It's just a remake of the original 1976 movie, and no where near as good as the original movie at that. Then the word is the CGI is so obvious and horrible that it takes away from the movie and makes the deaths comical. The whole blood dumping scene is supposed to be CGI as well. One guy who saw it said the CGI is so bad the fake blood bounces off of her. Sucks. Also, in this movie they made Carrie do all kinds of things that she's not supposed to be able to do. I will put that in the spoiler below.

SPOILER WARNING!
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
So in this version Carrie not only is she telekinetic but she is also is psyshic and can tell Sue Snell is pregnant and what gender the baby is. Instead of using her eyes like Sissy Spacek did, Chloe uses her hands and feet, waving and stomping like she was a witch or a superhero. In fact, people are saying they expected Prof. Xavier to pop in and make an appearance. Did I mention that in this movie Carrie can fly? LOL  Carrie also busts pavement open with one stomp and rips up roads. A good percentage of the scenes in the trailers did not make it to the movie. Most of the scenes that were cut involved  death scenes and the destruction of the town. Those who have seen the movie say there really isn't any scenes of her destroying the town at all in the movie. Instead of keeping to the ending of the book like we were led to believe the director was going to do, they instead use the ending of the original movie. Supposedly Carrie's headstone cracks at the end as if her power is still alive.

Save your money. Read the book then rewatch the 1976 movie with the wonderful Sissy Spacek. The 2002 made-for-t.v. version with Angela Bettis is also good.

My Offering To "He Who Walks Behind The Rows"



Indian corn...I just love it. It's so freaking pretty and looks great as a fall decoration. I try to get Indian corn when I can. This year it's been pretty scarce. I only found one store selling it and their pickings were slim. I like to use it for both Autumn/Halloween decorations and for offerings to my Indian spirits. You can make necklaces out of the kernels if you so choose. You can also just plant the kernels and grow your own Indian corn! I haven't grown them before but eventually I would love too.

If you caught the reference in the blog title then go to your kitchen and have yourself a cookie because you are super cool. LOL

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Tonight's The First Night Of The Blood Moon!

I meant to mention this earlier but the Harvest moon and Blood moon are my favorite full moons of the year. The harvest moon is the first full moon after the Fall equinox. The Blood moon  (Hunter's moon) is the next full moon.

It's just really cool to have "The Blood Moon" near Halloween-time.

Yard Asters

Yard Asters, a.k.a. Lawn Asters, are a staple of fall. They pop up everywhere. They come out in Spring as well but are full force in the Autumn. I just love them. If you don't know what I'm talking about you can view an image by clicking HERE.  I just love them! Most people view them as weeds, but not I. Like Dandelions they have adapted to constant mowing by growing very short. However, you can still find the taller varieties that are more like a tiny bush. They can get pretty big, too. So the yard asters have completely taken over many lawns in my area, a sign that fall is in full gear. It's just another sign that we definitely are in the Autumn season. If they weren't so small I would gladly pick them!

I Am Carrie



The new remake of Carrie will premiere tomorrow ( tonight in certain areas). I posted on this months ago. I love Carrie. It and Christine are my favorite Stephen King books. The major problem I have is that the actress playing Carrie (Chloe Moretz) is simply to pretty to play her. I do think the movie will suck but I will watch it anyway. The good news is that the movie is going to aim for the book ending, which will be nice. The ending of the 1976 movie with Sissy Spacek was just not good. The book ending is far more tragic.

If you haven't read the book I would highly recommend it. I read it in one sitting. It's not a lengthy book at all but it's a classic. Steven King did his research for the book and incorporated the 70's-era paranormal research into poltergeists, more specifically that they are not caused by ghosts but by disturbed adolescent teens. The target or the person whom the phenomenon centers around is usually a young woman who has just started her menses and who has been the victim of abuse. The trauma of the abuse with the hormonal changes is believed to unlock the mental power of telekinesis. However, and unlike in the book/movie, the power can not be consciously controlled. The good news is that once the young woman grows out of puberty or receives therapy/counseling for the abuse the phenomenon usually stops. There are cases where young adolescent boys are involved but it's considered rare.

The thing about Carrie is that we are all her. She is us. I think that's why so many people identify with Carrie and even root for her. If we had the type of power she did, and at that age on top of it, we know good and well that we too would be going on rampages and destroying the town, if not the entire planet. This said, I hope people realize the truth about what King was trying to communicate. Carrie began as an abused young girl. With time she slowly transformed into a monster. At the end of the book/movie, when Carrie goes on her rampage, it's either kill Carrie or be killed by Carrie. There's no going back. She can't be saved. There's no coming back from what she did. I remember when I read the book I actually got misty-eyed at the ending because this young woman could have gone on to do so much good in the world. She could have been a superhero but she was dealt a cruel hand by fate and chose a dark path.




Also, I'm going to bring some tampons to the theatre and throw them at the "plug it up!" scene! LOL

American Horror Story Coven - Saliva For Domination



If anyone watched the second episode of the new season then they should be aware that Fiona (played by Jessica Lange) spit into a glass of water and forced two men to drink it in order to have power over them. This is because saliva has domination qualities and I've blogged on it before.

http://thedemoniacal.blogspot.com/2012/04/saliva.html

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

The Art Of Seduction - Part 32 - Consequences - Stalkers



One of the more severe consequences of a seducer, of being "on", is the potential of being stalked. It's a potential because so many people ache and yearn for that connection. If they perceive it in you they can sometimes go off the deep end.

In "real life" I've had two female stalkers. I define stalkers not as the women who drive by your house, as so many women do that, but the ones who take it further, the ones who follow me at work, who follow me in public and of course the ones who perform crazy actions.

When I was in my early 20s I worked at a convenience store. One night a good looking blonde came in and began talking to me. She was from Germany and didn't quite have a grip on the English language but knew enough to get by. She asked me out and I said yes. She asked me for my number and so I gave it to her. Turns out she messed it up as she was trying to ask me out for her friend who was too nervous to ask me out. So I turn beet red and have to explain to her that I'm not going on a date with a person I've never seen. So the blonde walks out to her car and talks to a dark-haired woman in the car. I couldn't make out her appearance but from that distance she sort of looked like Velma from Scooby Doo. I was not physically attracted to her. So the blonde comes back in and says she's too scared to get out of the car. The blonde starts begging me to just go out on a date with her friend. I don't know I said yes, perhaps it was just because she was pressuring me and I didn't want to appear to be shallow. So I told her to tell her friend to call me after noon the next day as I worked graveyard and I go to bed as soon as I get home. I got off at 7am. Guess who called at 8am? Yep. She gave some crappy excuse how she just couldn't wait until noon to call. So I was kind of peeved off and told her I needed some sleep and for her to call back after noon. She called again at 11am. I guess she just couldn't wait another hour. This was the last straw. I told her that I didn't want to talk to her anymore. She started crying and then hung up and I thought that was the end of it. Nope! She started driving around my work, my apartment, calling and then hanging up, leaving notes and crap at my door, leaving threats and unintelligible voice messages. She even flattened my tires. She was a stalker for sure and I feel sorry for the guy who ends up with her.

The second stalker I had was the real passionate psycho kind, the kind that wants to fuck you and then kill and not necessarily in that order. She was always breaking my shit to get even with me for some imaginary offense. She delighted in breaking my windows, in my car and my apartment. She even did it to a friend's house when she thought I was staying there. When I finally cut it off I got actual death threats. She even went as far as stalking my friends thinking she could get to me through them. She kept it up for a couple of months and then just seemed to have fell off the planet.

So I've had two female stalkers in real life. Online, most of my stalkers are men. I don't know what possesses a man to stalk another man but there is usually some underlying sexual desire there. You know they are so angry with you and so hate-filled that you finally realize it's just a cover to mask their true desire? I was stalked by this one guy for weeks, if not a couple of months. I finally got sick of it and told him I knew that he had some sort of desire for me. He denied it and said I was stupid for even suggesting it but it's amazing how he stopped soon after I confronted him. I have one stalker that accuses me of being a witch. He seems to be on vacation at the moment but he pops in here and there to let me know he's still around. My latest online stalker is a guy with a foot fetish who wants to smell my feet. What makes him so weird is that he's so specific. He wants me to wear sperry boat shoes without socks so that my feet get really sweaty and stinky, as that's what he likes. Like no other shoes will do, I guess. Weird.

I will admit, there is something fascinating about having stalkers, like someone wants you so bad they go nutty-nuts over you. However, it ultimately is no joking matter. People who are obsessed with you can become violent and dangerous. They can eventually cross that line and "love you" so much that they want to harm and kill you. Be careful.

Monday, October 14, 2013

The Art Of Seduction - Part 31 - Consequences - Jealousy



One of the consequences of being a seducer, of being "on", is that of jealousy. People, both targets and other people in your life, will begin to view you as "theirs" even if you have never given yourself to them or even actively seduced them. In their head you belong to them and they react by getting extremely jealous of anyone who you encounter or engage in a conversation with. Men, women, they are all the same. They will ask you a million questions. That's the biggest sign they are jealous. Some of them will tell you they don't want you to talk to such person. Some will even tell the person to stop talking to you!

It's extremely important to learn to handle jealousy among people in your life. This may be difficult at times. I try to incorporate touch as a way to console jealous people. It lets them know that I still value them even if I truly do not want to pursue anything with them. When  you deal with jealous people you need to make sure not to say things that will send them off the deep end. Keep back the details that would only serve to further intensify their jealousy or arouse their suspicions. Don't get me wrong, a little jealousy is fun but it can quickly spiral out of control.

The Art Of Seduction - Part 30 - Concequences - Turning It On



We've entered the consequences portion of the art of seduction series. In this final section I will discuss some of the consequences of embracing the role of seducer.

In this blog entry I will be discussing how "turning it on" has consequences, primarily to attract attention from men and women whom you may have no desire to even seduce.

When you are "on", in your skin, in the driver's seat and behind the wheel, then people in your normal environment will take notice. Trust me, you will see the stares! They may even approach you.

For me, it's a lot like the consequences of doing love work. When you do love work people can come out of the wood work. It doesn't mean you need to be with them, it's just that it's a side-effect of the work. People sense it. They pick up on it. It's like something with your aura or that you have this cloud of sexiness that follows you wherever you go. Maybe it's some form of erotic radiation! LOL Anyway, prepare yourself in advance for it. Because once you flip the switch you will draw them.

I think part of the problem or cause behind it is that when you are on you will begin to act sexy without even realizing it. Like this morning I got the most erotic haircut I have ever received. Who knew massaging the scalp could be so sensual? Well, I think the woman doing it only acted that way because of me saying, "I like it messy", when she asked me how I wanted my hair. I guess I unknowingly gave a double entendre in my sexy voice or something. I was actually tired from getting up too early and wasn't even trying to be sexy but once you turn it on that's how it's like.

Perhaps a better example would be the guy at Walmart I encountered the other week. I went in to get my supplies for my salads (I eat a lot of salads), and this guy was there and he literally and blatantly stared me down, mouth slightly opened. He followed me around even. I only caught his gaze once by accident and he did that "head bob upward" thing that guys sometimes do when they acknowledge one another. I just smiled and looked down and decided to go to another part of the store. Stuff like that. You will have more and more experiences like this. It's like when you are turned off then you were invisible. As soon as you turn it on then they come a running.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Buddhist Center Opened Down The Street From Me

While driving today I just now realized that a church down the street has now become a Buddhist center. I will have to pay a visit and check it out! We already have a Buddhist temple and a Hindu temple here near me. I'll have to pay a visit and hopefully takes some pics if permitted!

The Art Of Seduction - Part 29 - The Down Low: Tips For Women

Warning! This blog entry may contain material some may find offensive. Read at your own risk.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*




The Down Low, or DL, for those who have been comatose for the past 20 years or so, is when seemingly heterosexual men seek out anonymous gay sex with men. It's presented as if it's more of a black thing but I can assure you it's not.

DL men are usually not "straight". They just aren't. Straight men have to be seduced by a guy before they will do anything gay. DL men actively seek out gay sex. Some aren't "gay gay" and I'll explain those below.

Women, listen up. It's rampant. You need to be aware of the signs. I've been propositioned by so many masculine men, men who usually have wives or girlfriends. The strangest is probably the cop who pulled me over for speeding. I'm fumbling for my insurance and license only to be asked to step out of the car. I was like, "shit!", but then was told to go sit in the front of his car. Next thing I know he hops in and starts rubbing his thigh. I look down to see he has a boner and he's actually rubbing it through his pants. Definitely uncircumcised as the whole car smelled like his sex. His pupils were freaking huge! I just scooted over and just looked out the window and ignored him until he told me I could go. I've had other run-ins with cops but I definitely can't even begin to talk about them here. I can't be 100% sure but I'm guessing the cop was married and probably even had kids. He was on the DL and this was not the first time he hat attempted this. Of course all he wanted was a blow job and then would have probably let me go with a warning. Instead, I declined and I got a ticket. There were no words spoken and he probably did this on purpose so that if I were to ever complain not only would it be my word against his but there would be nothing I could say he said that would indicate he was trying to pressure me.  Of course he could also be just the type of DL man who can't bring himself to verbalize his desires. There's two types, the ones who can't verbalize and the ones who can.

So what are some of the signs of a DL man? Well, you can probably find some stupid list of signs online but most of them are pure nonsense. Here's what I think are some good signs that your man may be on the down low.

1.) No hint of any gayness at all, won't even joke around about being gay. Men who are the DL don't want to bring any attention to homosexuality. So if your guy will joke around about being gay, maybe even do a lisp and act a fay, then they are likely not to be on the DL.

2.) Do not have any gay friends and don't associate with any gay people.

3.) Homophobic

4.) Boring in bed. If they are more boring than vanilla in the sack then you might be worried. If you try to get them to be freaky and they just can not get freaky with you then it may mean they are the type of guy that can't get freaky with someone they love and seek out their freak with anonymous sex, bet it with men or women. Either way it's a bad thing.

Now there's also a motivating factor that women do, or should I say refuse to do that causes some men to stray into DL territory. When women refuse to say give head or perform anal play with men it may cause the man to stray.

Some guys on the DL aren't really gay or even bi (supposedly) but rather seek out actions their women will not perform, such as getting blow jobs. It is a very common belief that guys give better head than women do since they already know what feels good to a man. Lots of men are curious about getting head from a guy. There are gay guys out there who only have sex via giving head to straight guys. They don't expect anything in return. Then there's the DL guys who want anal play and are either too ashamed to tell this to their women or their women refuse. So they seek it out with men.

Men come up with a variety of reason why they can engage in gay behavior and not be "gay gay". For example, I've known body builders who wank to muscle magazines (or even gay porn), guys who have bragged about getting head from a certain guy, and guys who freely admit their desire for drag queens. In their heads they come up with all kinds of excuses how they can engage in sexual activity with other men and have it not effect their identity. It's just really strange. I mean, I've had military guys open up to me about wild romps with drag queens. I don't judge people but it's just really weird that people are so open to me about this stuff. One of the weirdest situations I was in was at a former job where a co-worker had confided in us guys that he planned on going all the way with his girlfriend that night, losing his virginity at the same time. Well, he was real nervous that night at work and some idiot decided it would be best if he give the guy some downers to take. The guy was loopy as fuck and was wigging out. We weren't close at all but he approached me while I was by myself and was mumbling something I couldn't understand. Honestly, he was acting schizophrenic but of course it was the pills. He finally said, "I would y'know". I was like, "would what?". He then said he would have sex with me. I just looked at him like, WTF? He then touched my hand and that's when I told him to just go home and sleep it off and not to even try having sex with his girlfriend as he's too nervous about it. I don't think he counts as a DL guy, just some really conflicted guy who only had the courage to proposition me while under the influence of drugs. Strange. However, he might be full blown DL by now for all I know.

I could relate many more stories but they are pretty much all the same. The only difference is if the DL guy is either a verbal or non-verbal (like the cop). The verbal ones will approach men and instigate things. The non-verbal ones will use body-language and other cues or will just take advantage of any guy who they pick up on is interested in sex.

Ladies, be on the look out. Your man may just might be a DL guy. When in doubt, listen to your intuition. You might actually be picking up on some truth.





Friday, October 11, 2013

The Art Of Seduction - Part 28 - Seducing Friends



Seducing friends.....now that's a real tricky scenario. Quite frankly, I'm not good at it. So I'm not sure how much help I can be. The thing is that all of my friends who wanted me have naturally wanted me without me even slightly attempting to seduce them. And that's true for both my female and male friends. At best all I can say is be on the look out for signs they are attracted to you and want more than friendship?

With women there are going to be two types, the type that all of a sudden clam up and act really weird around you when before they were perfectly fine. Then there is the type that is more assertive and will let you know their intentions. This usually manifests as the woman inviting you into her bed. That's all it's going to be. She's not going to say, "Come over here and fuck me". It's going to be a situation in which you might stay over and you are like preparing to sleep on the couch and this time she asks you if you would just like to sleep in her bed. I've had this happen to me several times. That's how they roll.  You still need to be assertive, play and slap-n-tickle and all that, but that's usually how it goes down. I've really only actively seduced one female friend and I did it by simply talking dirty to her after we wrestled a bit. She got hot and bothered but she ultimately said she didn't like it because she said it was so out of character for me. However, I can assure you that if I had pressed it she would have let me bed her. That's the length of my experience with seducing friends. Honestly, I don't buy into that b.s. about friends becoming lovers and all that. Once I'm friends with a women I view her as a sister and that is the ultimate boner killer for me at least. For me, play must be established at the beginning of the friendship or it simply will not manifest (usually).

With my guy friends, I've already stated that a little over half of my (straight) guy friends have wanted to have sex with me. They too never come out and just say, "Hey buddy, fuck me". No, they do  other things to get the point across. When guys try to seduce other guys they tend to be subtle about it, or should I say the experienced ones do. Those who are inexperienced tend to be a bit more blatant and even comical. One of the classic techniques they will do is start by touching you to see how much you tolerate. In my experience, this normally takes place while riding with them in their cars or pick-ups. For example, I had this guy friend who was a drummer, he used to pretend to play air drums and then he would reach down and squeeze my thigh quickly and then go back to playing air drums. This would evolve to him patting me on my thigh as we rode together and then eventually it got to the point of lingering touches, where they keep their hands on you. Now, I'm such a tease I knew exactly what was going on. Basically they are testing to see how open to male-on-male contact you are. The longer you let them linger their touch the more they view it as a sign that you are down for some play. Another technique they will do, or at least in my experience, will be to bend over in front of you and then turn their head to look at you while they are still bending down. That's a classic technique they always pull. A more ballsy version is the faked  "accidentally nude" scenario in which they will come out of the shower wearing a towel and then drop it "accidentally" and then proceed to interact with you naked like it's no big deal. Nudity is no big deal but they are definitely using their nudity in an attempt to arouse you. They often combine this with bending over while looking at you as well. For example, they may drop their towel and then bend over to pick it up while looking at you. It's all a big act. The smart ones will incorporate mirrors into their play. They may stand naked in the bathroom and call out to you. When you come you immediately see their naked ass and they will just stand there looking at you in the mirror and try to talk to you like in a normal conversation. They can be creative like that. They too will invite you into their beds like female friends. You will be on the couch when you stay over and when they decide they want some of you they will want you to sleep in the bed with them. Then they will decide it's somehow best to sleep naked!  LOL Another tactic they use is to want to watch porn with you. When a guy wants to watch porn with another guy it can mean only one thing. They want to be put in a situation with you in which both of you will get erections and hopefully one thing will lead to another. So these are some of the techniques guy friends (normally bottoms) will try to use to get you to have sex with them.

Finally, the major warning about messing with friends. If you truly value the friendship my advice would be just to not go there. Sex will destroy a friendship in a heartbeat if both parties aren't 100% cool with it and about what it means, if anything. If you do not want to lose your friend then I would suggest you just play dumb. With all my guy friends who have tried this stuff on me I've always just acted stupid and pretending like I was oblivious. It works and it will save your friendship.

Never underestimate the power of alcohol. If two friends are drunk, stuff is bound to happen for the better or worse. Just keep that in mind. If you both fall victims to drunken lascivious debauchery, it's best to just both pretend it never happened.